End the farm.
Make fair launches the standard.
Our goal is to bring the strength of our community together, challenge the exploitative system we call Pumpf*ck, and push for fairer launches on PONS. We want to put our collective voice behind concrete changes—not another promise that leaves the community carrying the cost.
We will discuss these priorities with the community and decide our direction together. If PONS will not take that path, we are prepared to build our own alternative with our international programmers and developers. The community will help decide what we build and how it works.
Six questions.
One shared decision.
These are proposals to debate together, not finalized platform rules. Every voice in the Hood has a place in shaping them.
01. Creators must share the risk.
A system where creators risk almost nothing is unacceptable to us. Whether a token is a honeypot or not, launching should involve meaningful responsibility. When creation has almost no downside for its creator, the market becomes flooded with disposable tokens. What commitment should every creator make?
02. Max buy. Fairer access.
Our team brings a decade of experience in crypto. Purchase limits are an approach we want back on the table: how much should one participant be able to buy at launch, and for how long? We should evaluate max-buy rules alongside protections against snipers and coordinated wallets, and agree on the details together.
03. Liquidity and locked creator tokens.
Buyers should not bear the risk alone. We propose mandatory creator liquidity contributions and locks on creator tokens, with visible terms and unlock dates. Meaningful commitments could also discourage the endless launch of tokens with no lasting purpose. The amounts and lock periods are for the community to discuss.
04. Better audits. Fewer traps.
AI has advanced rapidly. We want to explore stronger AI-assisted audits, supported by technical review, to identify dangerous permissions and reduce honeypot exposure. A system that lets creators do anything while buyers carry the consequences needs to change. The community should help define which protections are required.
05. Fewer launches. More preparation.
If open-ended token creation cannot bring back the community spirit we miss, we should discuss an alternative: a carefully designed platform where community voting selects only 10 or 20 token launches per day. Projects would introduce and market themselves before launch, and meet shared fair-launch requirements. This is an option for debate, not a confirmed release plan.
06. No kings. Equal voices.
Our community speaks on equal terms with us. We came to free the forests, not to become kings. We are people from this community. We simply woke up a little earlier.
Discuss. Decide. Build.
We will gather ideas, debate the trade-offs and agree on our priorities together. Then we will bring a clear community proposal to PONS. If that path does not lead to meaningful change, we will discuss building the alternative ourselves.
We did not come to become kings.
We came to free the forests.
This is an independent community initiative. PONS has not committed to adopting these proposals.
Join the Hood →